starting as of market creation Jun 5h
Update 2025-06-05 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator is considering a distinction for what qualifies as Trump describing Elon Musk:
Whether it is a direct statement describing Elon Musk as a person.
Or if it is a statement describing Elon Musk's behavior in a specific situation. The creator has indicated they are open to interpretations regarding this distinction when resolving the market.
Update 2025-06-15 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): For a phrase to count, it must be from a verifiable source. Reports relying on an anonymous source will not be sufficient for resolution.
1,000
3.00@skibidist resolves YES, thanks.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6375017223112
starting at minute 3:22
"Have you spoken to Elon Musk? What happened there?" Bartiromo asked.
"I think he's a wonderful guy. I haven't spoken to him much, but I think Elon is a wonderful guy, and I know he's going to do well always," Trump responded. "He's a smart guy. And he actually went and campaigned with me and this and that. But he got a little bit upset, and that wasn't appropriate."
Not sure if the "wonderful guy" might count for the "A great guy" answer here, so I've only bet a little on that.
Does this count for “addict”, or would it not because it’s an unknown/anonymous source?
“Trump called Musk “a big-time drug addict” in a phone call shortly after their public feud.”
@KJW_01294 pretty sure the truth post calling Musk "CRAZY" was after this market creation. cc @skibidist
@deagol was it a direct statement describing him as a person though? or was it just describing Musk's behavior in a specific situation? I am open to interpretations
@skibidist This is what I saw reported (I myself don't do Truth nor X):
"Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!"
So I guess that's describing his behavior in a specific situation. However, I don't think that should be a disqualifying condition for this market.