Linked to this Kalshi question:
If there are more than 250000 federal employees no longer working relative to the January 2025 employee count before Jan 2026, then the market resolves to Yes. Outcome verified from FRED.
Note the resolution criteria—what matters is the change in the count of federal employees, not whether we can confirm Trump and/or Elon directly fired them. For reference, the specific chart Kalshi links to appears to be this one.
Elon might achieve this by leveraging Twitter mobs to scare people into quitting: https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/11/27/business/elon-musk-government-employees-targets
@TimothyJohnson5c16 Just firing them seems easier, but I can't say I would be opposed to this if it ends up working.
@Shai I don't know exactly how it works, but I think it's not so easy to just fire lots of government employees. For example, many (most?) of them are part of a union.
@VishalDoshi resolution criteria:
Outcome verified from FRED.
What matters is the FRED chart. If you want to adjust your bets based on potential furloughs or other such edge cases, you'll want to make sure you understand FRED's methodology.
The order book on this market is hilarious. Real odds are like 5 percent especially since no matter what they do they won’t be able to stop new hires so they might purge that many but it will be offset. On top of that Trump is going to use the military to deport people supposedly and that is going to require likely requisition of state national guard into federal service. Plus like aren’t they going to hire a shitload if border guards or patrol or whatever??
Change in fed govt employees following elections charts I made, data from https://www.statista.com/statistics/204535/number-of-governmental-employees-in-the-us/
@summer_of_bliss hm this is pretty interesting. Thanks for putting together. Wonder where those mostly came from (as in which departments or areas)...
From this source, 70% of federal employees works in natl security / defense (unsurprising)
However, I would have likely expected a spike in 2001 after 9/11, not the largest decline as seen in Brad's chart. However, possibly changes either didn't show up to 2002, showed up according to a different physical year boundry, or did not actually affect things as I expect.
@Dgfold yeah on 9/11, shows change in average number of employees across 2001 versus 2000, so wouldn’t pick up much change
here’s a more comprehensive chart:
@summer_of_bliss The big spikes followed by drops are probably from the census every ten years. It's not as volatile as it might seem.
@summer_of_bliss it would be nice to see a chart that also counted contractors, though that would probably be hard to do, since the move to have more of those is masking the growth rate.