How long will the government shutdown last?
472
Ṁ160k
Oct 31
14%
Other
11%
50-60 days (Nov 20-29)
19%
40-50 days (Nov 10-19)
14%
35-40 days (Nov 5-9)
14%
30-35 days (Oct 31 - Nov 4)
11%
25-30 days (Oct 26-30)
10%
20-25 days (Oct 21-25)
5%
15-20 days (Oct 16-20)
1.6%
10-15 days (Oct 11-15)
0.1%
5-10 days (Oct 6-10)
0.2%
2-5 days (Oct 3-5)
0%
0-2 days (Oct 1-2)

Resolution criteria

  • This market resolves to the single duration bucket that matches the length of the U.S. federal “lapse in appropriations” (government shutdown) that begins in FY2026 (Oct 1, 2025–Sep 30, 2026). Exactly one option resolves Yes; all others resolve No.

  • Start: 12:00AM ET October 1

  • End: when the President signs a law (CR or full‑year appropriations) that restores funding to all agencies affected by the lapse. Mainstream media (NYT, WSJ, WaPo) best estimates of this time will be used.

  • Counting: duration is the number of calendar midnights (ET) that pass while the shutdown is in effect. A lapse that starts and ends on the same calendar day counts as 0 days; any day with any portion under shutdown counts toward the total.

Background

  • A shutdown occurs when annual or interim appropriations lapse; under the Antideficiency Act, most activities stop except those authorized by law (e.g., protection of life/property). The longest prior shutdown lasted 35 days (Dec 2018–Jan 2019); others include 16 days (Oct 2013) and brief lapses in Jan/Feb 2018. (congress.gov)

  • As of Oct 1, 2025, agencies have been preparing for a potential lapse; e.g., HHS and FAA detailed expected furloughs and excepted operations if funding expires. These preparations indicate heightened shutdown risk at the FY2026 start. (reuters.com)

Considerations

  • Partial shutdowns are possible if some agencies are pre‑funded; this market measures from the onset of the lapse until all initially unfunded agencies are covered by an enacted CR/appropriations law.

  • OMB posts agency contingency plans that clarify which functions continue during a lapse; these are useful for confirming implementation timing. (whitehouse.gov)

  • Time zone is Eastern Time for start/end and day counting; newswires may report local times—use ET when categorizing duration.

  • Update 2025-10-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Bucket boundaries and exact ties

    • Durations strictly below a boundary resolve to the lower bucket; strictly above resolve to the higher bucket. Example: 4d 23h 59m -> 2-5; 5d 1m -> 5-10.

    • If the duration is exactly on a bucket boundary (e.g., exactly 5, 10, 15 days), both adjacent buckets will resolve at 50% each.

  • Update 2025-10-09 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Agency defunding clarification: If a new funding agreement is widely considered the end of the shutdown, it will count as the shutdown end date even if some agency is no longer receiving funding under the new agreement (as long as it isn't a Trump scheme to divert funds). The "all agencies" language is meant to prevent ambiguity when two separate bills are passed to fund different agencies in tranches—in that case, the shutdown ends at the later date when all initially affected agencies are funded.

  • Update 2025-10-10 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Market close date is not fixed: The creator will extend the close date as long as the shutdown lasts to allow continued trading throughout the shutdown period.

  • Update 2025-10-13 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Calendar date mapping added: The creator has added calendar dates to each duration bucket option to show which dates correspond to which buckets (e.g., "0-2 days (October 1-3)").

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:
bought Ṁ650 NO

@PaperBoy Would you mind modifying the text of each option, or adding text to the description, that shows which options map to which calendar dates? For example, instead of "0-2 days" it could say "0-2 days (October 1-3)"

(Asking this as a normal user, not as a mod)

Seconded

@Gabrielle sure thing. I think I did that correctly but let me know if you think it’s inconsistent with the description

@PaperBoy Can you also default the view to "Newest" order?

I just changed the default sort order to “Newest” - feel free to change it back to a different sorting order if you’d prefer @PaperBoy

@Gabrielle works for me!

[Chef's kiss]

@mods I think it's extremely unfair that he added extra options, devaluing my OTHER shares. This feels like cheating.

bought Ṁ150 NO

@Bandors you get shares in the new options added

@Bandors That's not how "Other" works - you had 475 shares in "Other" before, and you now have 475 shares of "35-40 days", 475 shares of "40-50 days", 475 shares of "50-60 days", and still 475 shares of "Other". So if any of them resolve to YES, you will get Ṁ475.

@Gabrielle Must have taken ages to code that logic in, but I see it now!

@Bandors we all go through the growing pains of learning this.

Cpuld OP resolve the first 3 options to NO now please.

@Yakushi12345 unfortunately it's not possible (manifold doesn't support it)

Given that Other is now at 45% would it make sense to add some new longer buckets?

@MichaelBlume yeah I was thinking that as well. @traders let me know if anyone has strong opposition to this.

@PaperBoy I'm all in favor of it.

@PaperBoy I bet Other from the start. How does it work if you make other buckets? Does my Other bet get automagically spread out to all of the new buckets? If not (and I can't imagine it would), then do not create other buckets.

@MichaeldelaMaza You should get the same number of shares in all new buckets.

@PaperBoy If other holders are compensated fully

@FecalAbhuman Shares of YES or NO in Other are automatically applied to new options proportionally to how many new options are added over the life of the shares in Other. If you wish to sell them then, you have to sell them from the new options.

@FecalAbhuman you will be, don’t worry. Manifold’s system does this type of thing well

@PaperBoy Maybe in buckets bigger than 5 days?

@Sqeedee I think I’m gonna add 35-40, 40-50, and 50-60

@PaperBoy do you think it would make more sense using calendar weeks for this? To make it easier for participants to reason about their responses. Like "second half of November" or "week of November X-Y"

@MichaelBlume That's cheating! It would devalue my OTHER shares!

@Eliza that makes a lot of sense and I wish I had set up the market that way from the start but I feel the need to have some consistency. Also doesn’t help that the 36th day is a Wednesday

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules