The recent sensation about the so-called alien mummies from Peru has stirred up significant debate and speculation. In 2023, a set of mummified remains, claimed to be evidence of extraterrestrial life, was presented to the Mexican Congress, generating both intrigue and skepticism. Jaime Maussan, a ufologist and journalist, asserted that nearly one third of these mummies' DNA was unknown, fueling further speculation about their origins. However, these claims have been met with considerable skepticism from the scientific community. Reports indicate that the figures are almost certainly human-made, with the Peruvian government asserting that they are, in fact, pre-Hispanic remains. Furthermore, the ninth annual World Congress on Mummy Studies, held in Lima, Peru, has denounced these claims as a hoax, calling for an official inquiry into potential archaeological crimes. Given this context, the question arises: Will these alleged alien mummies from Peru be fully debunked by 2025? This market seeks to predict whether conclusive evidence will emerge by 2025, debunking the extraterrestrial origin of these mummies and confirming them as human-made or of pre-Hispanic origin.
Resolution Criteria: This market will resolve positively if, by December 31, 2025, credible scientific reports or investigations conclusively debunk the extraterrestrial claims of the Peruvian mummies, affirming their human-made or pre-Hispanic nature. It will resolve negatively if such debunking does not occur by the given date.
Update 2025-10-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Resolution Criteria Update:
The market will resolve YES only if there is clear and credible debunking of the specific mummies presented in Mexico by December 31, 2025.
The absence of such debunking by the given date will result in a NO resolution.
1,000
3.00The article from the Daily Mail discusses recent developments concerning the so-called "alien mummies" discovered in Peru. These mummies, characterized by their three-fingered hands and elongated heads, have been a subject of controversy since their unveiling.
Dr. José Zalce Benítez, a forensic doctor associated with the Mexican Navy, conducted a dissection of one of these mummified hands, referred to as the "Nazca Tridactyls." During this procedure, he extracted a metallic implant composed of a complex alloy containing elements such as aluminum, tin, silver, copper, cadmium, and osmium. Dr. Zalce emphasized the sophistication required to create such an alloy, suggesting advanced metallurgical knowledge. He clarified that this particular hand was separate from the bodies previously presented to the Mexican Congress.
However, skepticism persists within the scientific community. Dr. Flavio Estrada, a forensic archaeologist at Peru's Institute for Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, contends that these mummies are fabricated constructs, assembled using animal bones and synthetic adhesives. He categorically stated, "They're not extraterrestrials; it's totally a made-up story."
Further complicating the narrative, Joshua McDowell, a former Colorado prosecutor, along with a team of U.S. forensic experts, examined one of the mummies named "Maria." They observed that the fingerprints on the specimen were composed of perfectly straight lines, lacking the loops and whorls typical of human fingerprints. McDowell noted that while this finding is unusual, it is premature to draw definitive conclusions about the mummies' origins. He suggested that the unique fingerprint patterns might result from specific preservation methods.
The article underscores the ongoing debate and calls for more comprehensive studies, including advanced DNA analysis and repeated carbon dating, to ascertain the true nature of these mummified remains. The Peruvian government has also expressed concerns about these artifacts, emphasizing the importance of protecting the nation's cultural heritage from potential fraudulent activities.
Summary from: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14346729/Scientists-studying-alien-mummies-Peru-new-details-emerge.html
@FranklinBaldo this market should be resolved already as it's been well debunked long ago. You disregard evidence and invest in your market against consensus.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/peru-dolls-are-not-aliens-forensic-experts-say
Your assertion that the researcher lacked access to the mummies for proper examination is not accurate. Forensic archaeologist Flavio Estrada, from Peru's Institute for Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, conducted a thorough analysis of the specimens. His examination revealed that the so-called "alien mummies" were, in fact, fabricated dolls constructed from animal bones and synthetic materials.
Estrada's findings were presented at a press conference organized by Peru's Ministry of Culture, where he detailed the methods used to create these fraudulent artifacts. This comprehensive analysis indicates that the researcher had direct access to the specimens and conducted an in-depth examination, leading to the conclusion that they are not extraterrestrial in origin.
@SimoneRomeo Reuters reported this as a hoax as well. Hard to swallow pills much? Check the similar market by Kable.
@SimoneRomeo sorry but the article linked does not state with clarity that Flávio Estrada had access to the specimens present in the Mexican congress.
@FranklinBaldo Do you have any source that it says he didn't? You should be the one proving that he didn't have access to the specimen. Otherwise you can't just make random claims as if they were evidence of anything
@SimoneRomeo I created this market because I’m highly skeptical of the alleged alien mummies. Avoiding proper scientific investigation is often a core part of scams like this. By restricting access to credible research, they perpetuate the mystery and exploit public interest. People need to recognize this tactic for what it is.
As for resolving this market, it should not resolve YES unless there is clear and credible debunking of the specific mummies presented in Mexico. The lack of such debunking doesn’t validate their authenticity—it’s actually part of how the scam works. By evading proper scrutiny, they create an illusion of legitimacy. Resolving the market YES prematurely would only reward these deceptive tactics.
@SimoneRomeo if you have any evidence that proper scientific analysis has being conducted after they being shown in the Mexican Congress, please share.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/peru-dolls-are-not-aliens-forensic-experts-say/
I think this should be sufficient.
They were debunked in 2016 (and if you don't already consider them debunked i'm way too scared to put mana on YES in this market)
@dgga Hey duN, I hear your concerns about the 2016 debunking. However, there's buzz that these Peruvian mummies might be a different set, not debuked yet.