If the next person to successfully land on the moon is a Chinese citizen, resolves "China"
If the next person to successfully land on the moon is a US citizen, resolves "US"
If multiple people successfully land on the moon at the same time and they have different citizenship, resolves proportionally to those citizenships:
1) 1 US citizen and 1 Chinese citizen would resolve the market 50% China, 50% US, 0% everything else.
2) 1 dual-citizen of US and Canada, and 2 US citizens, would resolve the market 5/6 US, 1/6 Canada, and 0% for everything else)
This market will be extended until it can be resolved.
@jim for reference
/KewlKid/first-to-land-humans-on-the-moon-ag
/BillMotz/who-will-send-the-next-astronauts-t
/lastuserhere/which-country-would-land-the-next-p
there are more but these are some of the canonical ones
@jim First to Land Humans on the Moon Again is a bad market unfortunately. The creator's comments have been declarifying and mostly opened up unnecessary cans of worms.
@JoshuaWilkes I totally misread your comment and now understand you were referring to that linked market. That makes sense, it’s kind of cursed to deal with some edge cases sometimes.. but lol to no Other option
@Bayesian Ah, I don't know if this is the origin, but this is what made me think about it.
@FergusArgyll jim is like no shit I've been saying this for years, but also I think the USA will win because AGI.
@FergusArgyll Thanks for sharing. That’s a really good interview by Eric. Even if one doesn’t share the expert’s political priorities, he explores a lot of interesting consequences.
@Bayesian https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Space_Agency The combined space agency for most of the EU, though not itself an EU organization
@sblaplace As stated this market will just be about the astronauts’ citizenship status but it’d be interesting for someone to create a market that isolates the ESA