πŸ‘πŸ‘Ž Manifold Leadership Approval Rating [Market Index]
πŸ’Ž
Premium
381
αΉ€720k
2525
41%
chance
Bet on love
Increased Creation Costs
Profile & Portfolio merged
Manifold.Love sunset
New Numeric market type
Browse ui update, color fill binary mc markets
Austin leaves Manifold team
1-99 bet limit on some markets
Mana economy changes
New mana USD prices
Mana transaction fees enabled
Pivot announcement
Pivot update delaying changes
Updated portfolio graphs
NA ability removed
Night before pivot selloff
Pivot: Spice/Points added, Mana devalued, Market cost changed
Creators earn 100% fee up to 1000
Higher question tiers
Play/Mini tier and expanded mc options
Manifest ends
Quick limit order buttons
Sum to 1 MC markets limited to 1-99%
paginated multi choice markets
James leaves to focus on Manicode
Sweepcash launch
Mana trader bonus returns
Txn fees removed
Re-enable ability to NA markets
Up/Down votes on comments

Use mana to let the team know what you think about how they're running the website. 100% means everyone is happy with the direction Manifold is going and the team behind it, and 0% means something has probably gone tragically wrong.

  • Does not impact profit rankings

  • Permanently open market, will not resolve.

Other Approval Ratings:

/strutheo/what-will-manifolds-approval-rating

/strutheo/what-will-manifolds-approval-rating-69a6850abbfb

/strutheo/what-will-manifolds-approval-rating-d7689b01293f

/strutheo/what-will-manifolds-approval-rating-da311ac4ea95

Get
αΉ€1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:

It seems that the held shares info on multi choice markets has been missing the last few days, hopefully it's just a temporary bug

@TheAllMemeingEye yup, no way to sell. But they come back when you purchase and disappear again when the page is refreshed.

Did the "sell shares" button disappear or is it just me?

New suggestion, start flagging accounts which are 6+ months inactive or banned to have their questions automatically sent to mods for resolving when they close.

Make "π•Š" searchable on the balance log page please, thank you!

Doesn't it defeat the purpose of this market if staff is holding limit orders lol?

@TimothyBandors are you counting me / Matt as staff? fwiw we are volunteer mods and not employed or anything.

@Bayesian Ah, I thought mods are paid staff.

@TimothyBandors i wouldn't worry too much about the "purpose"/functionality of this Very Serious market. the #1 NO holder is an account that does literally nothing but bet NO on this market each day. the actual % is meaningless it's just a place for people to discuss updates.

Dynamic scale graphs look like that on new markets:

@ProjectVictory I hate graphs that don't start at 0. What's even the point of having the graph if the scale is basically random ?

@Odoacre yeah i really dont like the dynamic scaling and would turn it off if i could

@ProjectVictory ideally we should be able to toggle vertical scaling for odds like we can the horizontal scaling for time

AI assisted markets just dropped πŸ€–

bought αΉ€100 YES from 40% to 41%

@TheAllMemeingEye I have my doubts on the high-quality criteria part but I'll definitely check it out.

@ProjectVictory yeah I have a feeling it's more like "quick and easy automated criteria"

Like the new closes in 7, 30, 90 days filters!

bought αΉ€25 YES at 44%
bought αΉ€2,000 YES

uh oops

Love the πŸ‘ / πŸ‘Ž in the comment section! Awesome!

4 traders bought αΉ€154 YES
2 traders bought αΉ€165 NO
bought αΉ€50 YES

@strutheo lets you dislike yourself but not like yourself

@Qoiuoiuoiu *also bug report - when hovering over the dislike button but someone else already disliked it the tooltip reads "like"

bought αΉ€57 NO

@10thOfficial absolutely hate it. don't turn this place into a circlejerk like reddit and silence principled bold contrarian voices like myself or trolls (like myself). The election cycle was pretty non-toxic because if you hated something you could just ignore it or have to articulate why, instead of just mindlessly pressing a button, or piling on someone. Turned out to pretty useful since a lot of Trump commenters were not popular to say the least

@dlin007 I don't agree with the trolling or the Trump part, but I do agree I already have reddit for this, I'm not downvoting anyone here, if I disagree with something I take the 2 minutes to articulate why on a reply :/

@dlin007 I agree that positive reinforcement of popular takes is a terrible incentive. Reddit, X, Insta, etc are all toxic epistemic blackholes because of the incentive structure created by rewarding the popularity of a take.

Β© Manifold Markets, Inc.β€’Terms + Mana-only Termsβ€’Privacyβ€’Rules