After France and Romania, i.e. after Apr 1, 2025
Previous edition:
Update 2025-05-15 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): A disqualification counts as soon as the ruling becomes binding. This is regardless of:
The possibility of an appeal.
Whether the ruling is later stayed.
Update 2025-05-15 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding appealed rulings:
If the individual/party can still run while an appeal is pending, the market does not resolve.
If the individual/party is barred from running unless the appeal resolves in their favor, the market does resolve.
I expect you will be liberal in interpreting major. The Romanian one was'nt major before...
So interesting question about Bardella here, who could be indicted for his role in the same embezzlement scheme as Le Pen.
@RaphaelBon It counts as soon as the ruling becomes binding, regardless of the possibility of an appeal or whether it is later stayed.
@skibidist Thanks but I’m not sure I understand: if say Jordan Bardella ever receives a ruling making him in principle ineligible to run, then it resolves yes for France, even if he can appeal? I’m not sure of what you mean by “a ruling becomes binding” — in principle a ruling isn’t binding if one can appeal and if that appeal makes it so that the ruling isn’t immediately applicable.
@RaphaelBon
if they can still run while the appeal is pending: market does not resolve
if they are barred unless the appeal resolves in their favor: market does resolve