It doesn't have to be exactly that, but something similar to it. Yes, that's subjective, but I think any more objective criteria will be goodhearted in the fight between twitter and the bots.
Resolves NO if people still see that regularly, YES if it's much less common than it is now.
1,000
3.00
@jacksonpolack yeah could you clarify if they have to be porn bots specifically? Or do the UAE/shrooms bots count too?
UAE and shrooms bots do not count, they do have to be porn bots
I definitely should've made that more clear in the description!
i have weak priors here. why are these bots still there? and what is X’s optimal strategy for addressing them?
@noney It's fundamentally just subjective. The bots and twitter are fighting, and I don't want to lay down specific criteria that the bots will then technically avoid as they try to avoid twitter's spam filters.
But the recent trend of nude photos that direct people to bios would count too
@jacksonpolack Wait, are you saying any bot advertising pornography means No? Totally different to how I read this. "[Nudes] in bio" is a specific type of spam
@jacksonpolack Some more specificity would still be good. Would someone spending a few hours a day on Twitter seeing NUDES IN BIO once a month count as the bots still there?
Good market! Could you please take a few measurements now of the current state? E.g. on 100 tweets in your timeline, how many instances of nudes bots are there? Same for a new account, or on the top 10 accounts on twitter by follower count? Just so that we've got some hard point of comparison rather than just memory.
I'm seeing none at the moment, but it could just be one battle won in the arms race, or maybe the bots aren't on just at this moment:
https://twitter.com/search?q=filter%3Areplies&src=typed_query&f=live
