data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf0b2/bf0b2d01be963ee5137ed824ec4fe89a009493bc" alt=""
Market resolves to YES if the USAID website (www.usaid.gov) becomes fully accessible and functional again, as verified by major news sources.
References:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/102ab/102ab9c4482d48e6777f9ff47b7fd17b2329f457" alt=""
It became indeed accessible, not sure about functional. Resolve after 24 hours as N/A because I honestly do not understand whether it is YES or NO if everybody is fine with it. Your suggestions about what to do about it are welcome.
@VonGadke Wow, it's a clear YES according to the letter of the question and a NO according to the spirit. I'm fine with either resolution and with an N/A.
@VonGadke "as verified by major news sources" has this happened?
It does not look very functional to me
@CraigDemel https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/02/04/usaid-trump-foreign-aid/
The notice was also displayed as the landing page on www.usaid.gov.
What is functional anyway? The site displays notice to employees and general public.
@VonGadke To me, "fully functional" would mean something similar to what was there before the shutdown.
@CraigDemel That was the spirit of the question, but arguably taking it literally, it is fully functional now, just its function has been reduced in scope.
@skibidist it's not, though. There's nothing about their currently active programs or their personnel. Once the entire agency is eliminated then I think the current website would count as fully functional.