What will be true about AGI and longevity in 2040?
➕
Plus
37
Ṁ3581
2040
32%
AGI is not developed
18%
AGI is developed and significant advances are made in longevity
24%
AGI is developed and turns out unfriendly/unaligned
10%
AGI is developed, but is not used in longevity research
37%
AGI is used in longevity research, but doesn't make significant advances
20%
AGI is developed, significant advances in longevity are made, but they require pre-natal intervention
6%
AGI is developed, but stays at human-like level of capabilities

AGI is currently generally expected to appear some time in 2030s: /ManifoldAI/agi-when-resolves-to-the-year-in-wh-d5c5ad8e4708

I would like to explore whether AGI will have any significant effect on longevity research and if no, then why.

Here are some definitions of things mentioned in the options:

  • AGI — and AI system, capable of autonomously doing any tasks involved in scientific research (since this question is about research)

  • Significant advances in longevity — increasing the life-expectancy at birth by at least 2x, to at least 160 years.

  • Whether AGI is used in longevity research — yes if some notable papers in the field are fully written by AI or some procedures are fully developed by AI. Domain specific AIs used for e.g. protein folding are not enough.

  • Human-like level of capabilities — the most complex high-level intellectual tasks done by AI can also be done by humans in no more than 10x amount of time it takes AI to do it.

  • Unfriendly/unaligned AGI — the actions of out-of-control AI lead to at least the state of national emergency in at least one country and result in significant slowdown in AI development either due to the regulations introduced as a result, or due to all or many AI researchers being dead.

The options in the question are not mutually exclusive.

I do not bet on my own questions.

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:
bought Ṁ70 NO

Am I correct in thinking their is some bias in the predictive power of the "Will AI be unaligned" question. The incentive structure encourages users to vote NO on that, as they would not be alive to cash out on any YES rewards? Or am I mistaken. Thanks.

bought Ṁ10 NO

Will only one of these resolve Yes? Shouldn’t this be a linked multiple choice market?

bought Ṁ5 NO

@ahalekelly The options in the question are not mutually exclusive.

@ahalekelly It is a multiple-choice market, though I tried to make different options mostly complementary to each other.

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules