Aella is one of my favorite people.
I hope she finds a husband that makes her happy.
I think her $100k incentive is a smart investment.
I'd like to help her.
I think putting $100k of liquidity into this market would really help her.
It would also:
(1) Strategically reward that liquidity decentrally to the individuals that successfully identify descriptive properties of her future husband.
(2) Distribute the incentive to a vast array of individuals instead of a lump sum to one person.
(3) Provide her helpful data points for identifying a suitable partner.
(4) Help me establish a positive relationship with her and the Manifold community in general.
(5) Hopefully provide a basis for how systems like this could be scaled to accomplish other tasks (how we could use the krantz mechanism to decentrally reward those that identify the properties that a safe AI would have).
It based on this tweet:
https://x.com/therealkrantz/status/1953641843721138533?t=TlI2X1JrU3YgQ71r9V0dzQ&s=19
This will resolve at Aella's discretion.
She might prefer to make a similar market for herself.
I hope I haven't done anything offensive.
I'm genuinely just trying to help and believe this would be effective.
Update 2025-08-08 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding children: "has kids" refers to having kids from a previous relationship (i.e., with someone other than Aella), not kids that the person might have with Aella after they meet.
1,000
3.00
Do we know Nate Soares's age and religious beliefs (Bing Copilot AI didn't know)? Also if she has kids with someone before they get married does that count as that person "having kids" or is that specifically about other people's kids?
@TheAllMemeingEye I would think it would refer to having kids from a previous relationship. I can clarify that by changing it to "has kids with someone else" if nobody sees a problem with that.