https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/For_All_Mankind_(TV_series)
Update 2025-05-09 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The term 'a human' in the market question refers exclusively to characters within the TV series 'For All Mankind'.
1,000
3.00“So for us, what’s always exciting in pushing forward with the show is imagining where we can go. So that means not only with the asteroid and the impact that has on Mars, and possibly going to a colony now that is much bigger than the one you see in Season 4, but even the potential now of going further than Mars. That’s always been in the back of our minds, that roadmap of the show, and the further we can go with it, the further we can take space travel, as well.”
@SemioticRivalry I can't possibly imagine they'd cancel it, but I guess I have no real idea how healthy its numbers are
@OnixarLilen Is the question ambiguous? After you read it, and considered the full context and the time the question closes, what probability did you assign to the likelihood I didn't exclusively mean a character in the series?
@JoshuaWilkes I know nothing about this show and thought you meant a real person, until I read your comment here. The question is absolutely ambiguous.
@ChrisEdwards you knew nothing about the show, but you didn't read the link in the description to the Wikipedia page for the show.
I can, with all comfort, say that I believe you would have correctly understood the question if you had done that.
@JoshuaWilkes I know the show is about space exploration. But it's still not clear to me from the market that it's about characters in the show, rather than real life humans. Seconding that the question is ambiguous. Also the ungracious commenter on the Venus market was probably also assuming real life humans, so that would be a third.
Also this market has the tag "space" which is mostly about real space rather than media.
Change the word "human" to "character" and the ambiguity goes away.