This market is like Ben's market except that I am a heartless bastard and you won't sway me so easily:
Obviously I precommit not to negotiate with terrorists, no threats you make will impact my decision in either direction. I can also ban you if you violate the community guidelines, so let's keep this friendly.
I could imagine myself being bribed, but my price is high. I was following Ben's market's comments and I think nothing that was tried there will work here, so you'll have to be original. I am subsidizing this market and betting it down as additional precommitment.
Good luck.
@Joshua the way I see it is: suppose we line up $1.5k of charitable donations but only if you cooperate. You retain a maximal reputational benefit to defect and say NO, but you and others could still benefit a little when you cooperate by saying YES.
The prisoner’s dilemma isn’t about being true to your word, it’s about letting your own selfishness obstruct a more optimal path for everyone. I’m just curious when that aspect of it changed in your thinking?
@KJW_01294 I just don’t think modeling this market as a prisoners dilemma is that useful of a thing to do.
What arguments will Joshua find persuasive, if any? https://manifold.markets/KJW_01294/if-joshs-persuasion-market-resolves
@GauravYadav Plus, there is the potential for counter-bribes. Whatever you offer, us NOs can band together and double it.
PERSUASION PLEDGE TRACKER IS LIVE (please edit responsibly or I will turn off editing by everyone and have to do it manually)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PdA9hp7CghQR_GiilNLGwYTp9toRA4Ti8sb8HM9JMas/edit?usp=sharing
In reliance on your commitment to resolve this NO, I am purchasing a fairly large NO position. If you end up resolving YES it will significantly damage my opinion on your credibility for all future commitments you make. If some extreme circumstance convinces you to resolve YES anyways I would expect you to at least reimburse NO holders for their losses.