In what year will artificial intelligence solve a Millennium Prize Problem?
53
Ṁ10k
2051

Invalid contract

Background

The Millennium Prize Problems are seven illustrious open problems in mathematics designated by the Clay Mathematics Institute (CMI) in year 2000, each carrying a $1 million dollar prize for the first correct solution. The Poincaré Conjecture has already been solved; only six remain:

  • Birch and Swinnerton‑Dyer Conjecture

  • Hodge Conjecture

  • Navier–Stokes Existence and Smoothness

  • P vs NP

  • Riemann Hypothesis

  • Yang–Mills Existence and Mass Gap

An AI system producing a formally accepted proof for any one of these six problems would constitute a historic milestone for both mathematics and artificial‑intelligence research.

Resolution criteria

  1. Evidence required – A peer‑reviewed paper in a recognized scientific journal or an officially accepted Clay Institute submission must show that the proof was generated by an AI system and fully resolves one of the six unsolved Millennium Prize Problems.

  2. AI autonomy – Humans may design, train, or fine‑tune the model, but the final mathematical proof must be produced autonomously by the AI. Human assistance is limited to setting up the AI architecture and verifying/verbatim formatting; humans may not add new logical steps or insights.

  3. Earliest‑year rule – The market resolves to the bracket containing the calendar year in which the qualifying paper (pre‑print or journal) is first made public. If multiple problems are solved by AI, the earliest qualifying publication date counts.

  4. Fail‑safe – If no qualifying solution is by before January 1, 2051 the market resolves to Not applicable.

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:

this market will almost certainly resolve N/A

Arbitrage Opportunity

Arbitrage

sold Ṁ28 ???

I don't understand why people keep making markets that resolve N/A when something happens late/never. That means that people that believe that it will happen late/never cannot make any productive bet to make money. And it means that it's easy to misinterpret the market probabilities, because it's all conditional on an AI solving a millenium prize problem before 2051.

@FlorisvanDoorn aw damn, I missed that and tried to arb with another market.

But yeah, NA should pretty much never be part of the design for a market.

This would be so much better as independent multi-choice. You could resolve periods NO as each deadline passes, add future periods as time passes, and add more "resolution" for periods with high probability.

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules