Will "Behavioral red-teaming is unlikely to produce..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
Basic
1
Ṁ72026
13%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2024 Review resolves in February 2026.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Behavioral red-teaming is unlikely to produce clear, strong evidence that models aren't scheming is one of the top fifty posts of the 2024 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000and
3.00
Related questions
Related questions
Will "Mechanistically Eliciting Latent Behaviors in..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Discriminating Behaviorally Identical Classif..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Catching AIs red-handed" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "Attitudes about Applied Rationality" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
43% chance
Will "The Leopold Model: Analysis and Reactions" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "Response to Aschenbrenner's "Situational Awar..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
22% chance
Will "Me, Myself, and AI: the Situational Awareness..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
16% chance
Will "Current safety training techniques do not ful..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
10% chance
Will "AIs Will Increasingly Attempt Shenanigans" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
11% chance
Will "Skills from a year of Purposeful Rationality ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
22% chance